Worldwide Patent Law Reform and Hong Kong’s Response HKU Workshop

20150126_084044

 

University of Hong Kong Law & Technology Centre and the Intellectual Property Department of Hong Kong organized the IP Forum 2015 on 16 January 2015 at HKU.  The topic was “Patent and Innovation: Worldwide Patent Law Reform and Hong Kong’s Response”. The question that would be raised was, and hopefully answered was: “Can patent promote innovation?” Just as the poster announcing the event promised the forum/workshop brought “international and local patent law scholars and practitioners to explore the patent law reform around the world and Hong Kong’s proposed change to introduce an “original grant patent” system, and to discuss how these changes may be conducive to innovation.”

– Hong Kong will probably get independent patent, China’s SIPO will teach HK how to examine

– Professor Randall Rader Preaches the Blessings of Patents for Innovation at Hong Kong University

– Hong Kong Patent Practitioners Divided Over Original Grant Patent in Hong Kong

– Professor Bryan Mercurio on Patent Law: “One Size Does Not Necessarily Fit All”

– Prof Yahong Li Provides Overview of How China Put Innovation on Agenda, But “Patent Quantity Does Not Automatically Translate Into Quality Patents”

– “In Regard to Patent Systems Hong Kong is in the Same League as Fiji and the Seychelles”

 


continue reading…

Rethinking Intellectual Property Protection in Hong Kong

After the welcome remarks by professor Douglas Arner (head Department of Law, HKU) and the opening speech by Peter Cheung, (director IPD, HKSAR Government) see here, the first panel presentation of the Round Table event organised by Law & Technology Centre of HKU and IP Law Center at Drake University started, moderated by assistant professor Haochen Sun, […]

Should Hong Kong (Also) Get Its Own “Normal” Patent System?

Hong Kong’s patent system spinning…Whirlpool in middle of flag, a suitable symbol  So far Hong Kong’s patent system has been mainly a re-registration system of Chinese patents, United Kingdom patents or European patents. Yesterday, October 4, 2011, the Hong Kong government issued a consultation paper, about whether this should change. Should Hong Kong be able to […]

“China Will Reshape International Intellectual Property Policy”

I just read a great paper by Andrea Wechsler ‘Intellectual Property Law in the P.R. China: A powerful Economic Tool for Innovation and Development’, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition & Tax Law Research Paper No. 09-02, November 12, 2008, download at SSRN here. In 56 pages Ms Wechsler takes you on a journey […]

New Draft Third Patent Law Amendment: Slight Improvements

In the beginning of this year there was not much reason for optimism regarding the third patent law amendment, read ‘Curb your enthousiasm. The earlier draft included the requirement that Chinese legal and natural persons must first apply for patents before making foreign applications. That’s why I wrote in July ‘Discover Your Invention in China […]

Discover Your Invention in China Or Lose Protection

Ms Patti Waldmeir has another interesting article about the upcoming patent law in China. She rightly zoomed in on the controversial articles. In February I posted a blog about the articles 49, 50 and 74 of China’s third amended patent law, entitled ‘Curb your enthousiasm’, read here. ZTE, the big Chinese telecommunications equipment company talked […]

China’s Third Patent Amendment: Curb Your Enthousiasm

China’s upcoming third amendment of its patent law has moved a lot of pens, or rather fingers, to write critiques and analyses. Mr Timonthy J. Maier partner of Maier & Maier PLLC, a law firm in Alexandria Virginia (US) and blogger of Post-Grant gives a good overview of the most controversial paragraphs of the draft. […]

Cheng Yongshun’s Critique On US Patent Reform Act Ammuniton To Opposites

Philip Brooks’ Patent Infringement Update has a great post called ‘China Weighs in on Patent Reform Bill’, read here. It is great when intellectual property scholars of different countries can learn from each other. For a long time a stream of advice on and ideas about IP flowed mainly from Europe and the US in […]